What is Hydrogrossular’s Place Among the Thirteen Minerals First Described From New Zealand?

Thirteen minerals have been first described from New Zealand and accepted as valid by the International Mineralogical Association. Hydrogrossular is the fourth one to have been so discovered. In a previous Post, I said I would look at these minerals. Simon Nathan has provided a list of the 13 on the website of the Geoscience Society of New Zealand. There are more informative comments by Nathan on them in Te Ara The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Two very useful if more technical sources are Mindat.org, a non-commercial online mineralogical database (the world’s largest), and rruff.info, an integrated database of the chemistry, crystallography, x-ray and other analytical data about minerals. Rruff.info also includes online versions of important publications on different minerals.

A mineral is a naturally occurring inorganic solid, with a definite chemical composition, and an ordered atomic arrangement. Often the best way for a mineral to form is through the cooling of very hot water or other fluid which contains it in solution. A rock is made up of one or more minerals, most often more than one. In a rock, mineral grains are fused, cemented or bound together. For example, granite is a rock primarily composed of three minerals – quartz, mica and feldspar. The crystals of these three minerals interlocked during the cooling of molten magma. The quartz is grey and glassy, the feldspar is light, often in prismatic crystals, and the mica is glittery, being dark or silvery in colour. 

The following are the 13 New Zealand-origin minerals in the order in which they were discovered:

1) “Taranakite” (above left) is a fine-grained cream-coloured phosphate first described in 1865 by James Hector (NZ’s leading scientist at the time) and William Skey (an analytical chemist). It was named after the Province of Taranaki as it was first found on small islands near New Plymouth in that Province.

2) “Awaruite” (above middle), a natural nickel-iron alloy, was first described in 1885 by William Skey (mentioned in #1 above). It had been obtained from gold miners south of Haast on the West Coast of the South Island, around the Gorge River, and was named after nearby Awarua/Big Bay.

3) “Tuhualite” (above right), a violet crystal that is unique to New Zealand, was first identified by geologist Patrick Marshall in 1932. He had found it on Tuhua/Mayor Island in the Bay of Plenty, its only source. 

4) “Hydrogrossular” (above left) is a calcium-rich garnet that was first described by Colin Hutton, a geologist and later professor of mineralogy, in 1943. He analysed samples of the rock from the Nelson area. The presence of water and thus hydroxide in its chemical make-up led to its naming. (See previous Post.)

5) “Huttonite” (above middle) is a radioactive cream–coloured crystal, first discovered in beach sands from the West Coast by Colin Hutton (see #4 above) who sent it to Adolf Pabst, an American mineralogist, to analyse. It was first described in publication in 1951 by Pabst who named it in honour of Hutton.

6) “Wairakite” (above right) is a colourless to white crystal found in geothermal environments. It was discovered and named in 1955 by Alfred Steiner, a pioneer geothermal scientist. He had found it while examining hydrothermally altered drill cores at Wairākei in the course of exploration for geothermal steam.

7) “Wairauite” (above left) was announced in 1964 by G.A. Challis and J.V.P. Long who worked in the  Department of Mineralogy and Petrology at the University of Cambridge. It is a natural cobalt-iron alloy and was discovered by electron micro-probe analysis of Awaruite (#2 above). Wairauite occurs as microscopic, scattered grains in serpentinite, often alongside Awaruite, the grains rarely exceeding 5 microns (0.005 millimetres), so electron micro-probe is the only way to see it. It is named Wairauite as the grains initially analysed were found in the Red Hills serpentinites of the Wairau Valley in Marlborough. [Serpentinite is a rock composed of one or more serpentine group minerals, the name originating from the similarity of the texture of the rock to that of the skin of a snake.] [An electron micro-probe is an analytical tool used to non-destructively determine the chemical composition of small volumes of solid materials. It works similarly to a scanning electron microscope.] 

8) “Akatoreite” (above middle) is a fibrous yellow-orange to orange-brown mineral recognised by Peter Read and Tony Reay (geologists from Carleton University and the University of Otago respectively). It is a previously unknown manganese silicate mineral. They reported in their 1971 publication that the mineral was found in a manganese-rich patch of chert and carbonate on the South Otago coast, three kilometres south of the mouth of the Akatore Creek, about 12 kilometres east of Milton. 

9) “Motukoreaite” (above right) is a poorly cemented fine-grained calcareous rock that occurs on Browns Island/Motukorea in the Waitematā Harbour, Auckland. The rock was first noted in 1941 by John Bartrum, a Professor of Geology, who called it “beach limestone”. It was not officially described and named as Motukoreaite until 1977 in an article by  Kerry Rogers (University of Auckland),  James Chisholm (British Museum), R.J. Davis (British Museum) and Cam Nelson (University of Waikato). It occurs as a boxwork of tiny crystals, each about 3 microns (0.003 millimetres) across. The crystals are semi-transparent and are white, pale yellow, pale yellow-green, or colourless.

10) “Feruvite” (above far left) is a dark brownish-black iron-rich variety of tourmaline found in a coarse-grained granitic rock on Cuvier Island/Repanga. The island is located 23 kilometres south-east of Great Barrier Island, a similar distance to the north-east of Coromandel Peninsula. Philippa Black from the University of Auckland had noted the occurrence of a iron-rich tourmaline on Cuvier in 1971. She later provided specimens to Joel Grice and George Robinson of the National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, who found they contained this previously unknown mineral. Grice and Robinson published their discovery in 1989. The mineral is part of the uvite group, and as it is rich in iron (Fe), it was named Feruvite.

11) “Coombsite” (above second from left) consists of tiny brownish-yellow fibrous crystals. These were found in brown patchy aggregates from a small area of manganese-rich rock at Watsons Beach on the South Otago coast (only about 3.5 kilometres south of where Akatoreite is found). Two Japanese mineralogists, Teruhiko Sameshima and Yosuke Kawachi, discovered this new manganese mineral and described it in 1991. They named it in honour of Douglas Coombs, Professor of Geology at the University of Otago. Coombsite is very rare and has been found in only three localities worldwide, in New Zealand, Brazil and Romania.

12) “Ferroceladonite” (above second from right) and 13) “Ferroaluminoceladonite” (above far right) were discovered in the 1990s when crystals from the Hokonui hills, east of Gore, were analysed by electron micro-probe. Previously the crystals had been identified as celadonite, a well-known mica group mineral found in altered volcanic rocks. However, the micro-probe analysis revealed two new minerals, which were named Ferroceladonite and Ferroaluminoceladonite. The crystals are extremely small, only 1 to 2 microns thick. A publication authored by Gejing Li, Donald Peacor, Douglas Coombs and Yosukee Kawachi identified these two minerals in 1997. Ferroceladonite is clay-like, usually green, and includes fine coatings and powdery masses. It was named for its ferrous content and its relation to celadonite. Ferroaluminoceladonite was also reported to be usually green in colour, is described as earthy, and its name reflects the significance of the presence of aluminium.

Future Posts may look at some of these minerals and their discovery in more detail. The first is Taranakite: The Story of the First Mineral Described From New Zealand. The second is Awaruite: The Story of the Second Mineral Described From New Zealand.

Pre-Polished Batch of Gemstone Beach Stones – Comments on Pre-Polishing

This batch of 64 stones have just been tumbled in a 4lb barrel with tin oxide “pre-polish” powder. This type of tumble is sometimes seen to be optional, with many stone collectors/polishers simply moving straight to the final “pro-polish” tumble once the stones have been smoothed with a fine silicon carbide grit (e.g., 320 or 400 mesh). However, it has become more common for this stage to be included. [Up-Date 2021: My supplier no longer stocks Pre-Polish tin oxide so I am moving to a one-stage polish approach – see this Post for more information.] 

For the “pre-polish” stage, I use a tin oxide powder of 5 microns.  A “micron” is an abbreviation for a “micrometre”, or a millionth of a metre, that is, one-thousandth of a millimetre (about .00004 inches). A human hair is, on average, about 75 microns across. Other media can be used for pre-polishing. For example, Steve Hart in his “Modern Rock Tumbling” (2008), reports that he uses 1000 mesh silicon carbide grit which is 4.5 macrons in diameter (page 39). [320 mesh silicon carbide grit is about 29 microns, according to the Washington Mills website.]

The aim of the “pre-polish” stage is to produce a smoother stone than possible with coarser tumbling media. I follow the recommendations that came with the tumbling material I bought from the Rotorua Rock and Gemstone Shop. These are to tumble stones in “pre-polish” powder for between three and five days (note that this is for less than the one week or more recommended for all other stages). “Pre-polishing” assists with the final “pro-polish” stage. After “pre-polish”, the stone is not yet glossy and shiny but is very smooth.

Why are Hydrogrossular Garnets found in Nelson and Orepuki?

At the end of my first Post in this series, What are Hydrogrossular Garnets?, one of the questions I raised was why hydrogrossular stones are found in New Zealand primarily in two regions more than 400 kilometres apart, in the Nelson area as well as around Orepuki, at the top and bottom of the South Island. [Writing in May 2021: As explained at the end of this Post, it has been suggested that hydrogrossular garnet can also be found on the West Coast of the South Island, and maybe also in the North Island. July 2022: I have also seen a report of hydrogrossular garnet being found on a beach in Napier.]

I have come to associate hydrogrossular stones with Gemstone Beach at Orepuki because they are not found anywhere else on the southern coast. I have heard third or fourth hand of someone who found one on a Riverton beach but the point of that story was how unusual this was. I have spent more time on Riverton beaches than Gemstone Beach but have found hydrogrossulars only on Gemstone. [Writing in May 2021: Over the past couple of years I have found a couple of small hydrogrossular stones on the Back Beach at Riverton.] Sources of information such as Te Ara The Encyclopedia of New Zealand often mention only Gemstone Beach as where you can find them in New Zealand.

When I undertook more careful research on hydrogrossular garnets it came as a surprise that the area around Nelson was treated as a key source area.  In the entry on “Hydrogrossular” in “A Photographic Guide to Rocks and Minerals of New Zealand” by Nick Mortimer, Hamish Campbell and Margaret Low (2011), it is noted that the world’s first occurrence of the rock was described from the Nelson-Dun Mountain area by Colin Hutton in 1943 (more on this in a later Post). It does go on to note that hydrogrossular can be found on Gemstone Beach as well as in the streams and rivers east and south of Nelson city.

Photographic Guide p34 bottom [Note: May 2022 – This next paragraph often refers to “grossular” rather than “hydrogrossular” garnet, but the two are not the same. I am at present unsure whether Thornton’s comments refer only to “grossular”.] Jocelyn Thornton, in “The Field Guide to New Zealand Geology” (2003), reports that “grossular garnet” can be found in the Dun Mountain area, “found in translucent green masses that can be polished” (page 69), as well as in the Roding, Lee and Maitai Rivers in Nelson (see first photo below for Thornton’s geological map of Nelson area). She points out that rodingite, a rock named after the Roding River, a mixture of grossular and diopside or diallage, can also be found in Cascade Creek in the Eglinton Valley near Milford Sound (see the second photo below, from Te Ara The Encyclopeida of New Zealand). “From there the grossular garnet makes its way through the lakes and down the Waiau [River], being tumbled into the rounded pebbles that can be found with a little effort on Orepuki Beach” (page 70). A 1969 research paper by J. G. Williams at the Department of Geology at the University of Otago had identified hydrogrossular in rocks in the area around Cascade Creek in the Eglinton Valley. Thornton’s book includes a photo of hydrogrossular from the Nelson and Orepuki areas (Plate 1E, opposite page 136 – see third photo below). Riverton Museum has a sample of hydrogrossular from the Eglinton Valley (see fourth photo below). In a  2018 “Southland Times” column (second item), local journalist Lloyd Ester reports: Southland’s Gemstone Beach has the best assortment of unusual pebbles in New Zealand. A combination of ocean currents, shape of the coast and the proximity of the Waiau River – the source of many of the stones – means that the rarities are concentrated along a short strip of beach. The best known of the “gemstones” are grossular garnets which are distinguished by their gloss and weight.” Nevertheless, the Waiau River is relatively young, in geological time. For instance, Thornton presents a map of what the Western Southland-Fiordland area would have looked like about 50 million years ago, the Waiau Valley being under sea (see fifth photo below). It’s possible that some of the hydrogrossular rock that became pebbles on Gemstone Beach were swept there by ocean tides millions of years ago.  

To return to the question being examined in this Post: Why are hydrogrossular stones found in New Zealand primarily in two regions more than 400 kilometres apart, at different ends of the South Island? This distribution is not random but is in fact part of a much larger pattern. The first map below, found in a Google image search, shows that the sequence of terranes in Fiordland, Southland and Otago is repeated in Nelson and Marlborough. A “terrane” is a floating bit of the earth’s crust that butts up against a continent (New Zealand is part of the Zealandia continent, much of which is under water – see second map below). This disjunction in the terranes leads to the idea of there being western and eastern geological provinces making up the South Island (see third map below, from a 2013 article in “Gondwana Research”).  New Zealand consists of at least 10 terranes (see pages 41-42 of Peter Ballance’s, 2017, “New Zealand Geology: An Illustrated Guide”  for a list and description). But these have been partially rotated and then split by the Alpine Fault. As shown in the map by Jocelyn Thornton (fourth map below), the rocks (terranes) demonstrate that Northwest Nelson and Fiordland were once together. The two sources of hydrogrossular garnets may be 400 kilometres apart now but they are in the same terrane and 25 million years ago were in the same locality.  

The Alpine Fault runs for about 600 kilometres along almost the entire length of the South Island. It is a segment of the boundary between the Pacific Plate and the Australian Plate (see map below, from Wikimedia). The Southern Alps have been uplifted on the fault over the last 12 million years in a series of earthquakes. However, most of the motion on the fault is sideways, with the Tasman district and West Coast moving north and Canterbury and Otago moving south. Horizontal movement of the Alpine Fault is about 30 metres every 1,000 years, which is very fast by global standards. Each time it has ruptured, it has also moved vertically, lifting the Southern Alps in the process. GNS Science estimates that in the last 12 million years the Southern Alps have been uplifted by  20 kilometres, and it is only the fast pace of erosion that has kept their highest point below 4,000 metres. Glaciers and rivers have removed the rest of the material and spread it out across the lowland plains or onto the sea floor (and beaches!). The Alpine Fault was not recognised until 1941 because the area was rugged and isolated, and earlier generations of geologists did not have the advantage of having an aerial view.

In conclusion, hydrogrossular garnets are found primarily in two regions in the South Island more than 400 kilometres apart because of the way that the Alpine Fault has split whole terranes of rocks and moved them sideways, south to north. [Writing in May 2021: A reader of this Blog has told me he has found what he thinks is a hydrogrossular stone in a West Coast river. This is the first time I have heard of a West Coast location, but it makes sense if hydrogrossular rock “travelled” north along with the Alpine Fault. On the way, rivers could certainly have moved stones away from the fault. The reader also suggested that hydrogrossular garnet can be found in the North Island.]

The next Post in this series looks at how hydrogrossular garnet is one of 13 minerals that were first described in New Zealand. 

Information on the four photos at the top of this Post:

First photo: A sample of hydrogrossular garnet from the Eglinton Valley, in a drawer of rock samples in the Riverton Museum, Te Hikoi.
Second photo: A compartment of hydrogrossular stones and at least one quartz stone, from my own collection of polished stones.
Third photo: Handful of hydrogrossular garnets from Gemstone Beach, on page 155 of “The Story of Murihiku/Southland – A synopsis: An overview of Southland’s Heritage” by Russell Beck, Cathy Macfie and Lloyd Esler, April 2007 https://docplayer.net/57903929-The-story-of-murihiku-southland.html
Fourth photo: Rodingite rock sample, from Te Ara The Encyclopedia of New Zealand https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/9077/rodingite

Why are Hydrogrossular Stones Called Garnets?

These four photos are of hydrogrossular garnets discovered on Gemstone Beach, near Orepuki (the last two photos are of the two sides of the same stone). They don’t look like garnets, do they? We are used seeing garnets like this:

natural-red-garnet-stone-drop-earrings
Source: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/natural-red-garnet-stone-drop-earrings-925-silver-Natural-gemstone-earring-women-generous-fashion-drop-Earrings/32789404123.html

The word “garnet” comes from the 14th‑century Middle English word “gernet”, meaning “dark red”. It is thought to be derived from the Latin “granatus”, from “granum” (meaning “grain, seed”), and possibly a reference to “pomum granatum”, the pomegranate, a plant whose fruits contain abundant and vivid red seed covers which are similar in shape, size, and color to some garnet crystals. In fact, garnets can be found in a wide range of colours, although red is the most common.

In a previous Post, What are Hydrogrossular Garnets?, it was noted that the chemical composition of hydrogrossular garnets is hydrous calcium aluminium silicate and that hydrogrossular garnets hardly ever occur as good crystals but rather as dense masses. This Post aims to explain why hydrogrossular garnets are called garnets and why they are not crystals.

Stones are made up of at least one mineral, often more. A mineral is a solid chemical compound that occurs naturally in pure form. These ideas have led to the view that rocks are to be officially named and identified by means of a scientific description of, among other things, the chemical make-up of their constituent minerals. (Other things that help to identify minerals include hardness, “specific gravity” meaning density, “lustre” or how it reflects the light, “cleavage” meaning its tendency or not to break along smooth planes parallel to zones of weak bonding, and colour.) So what is a “garnet” or not depends on its chemical make-up. I am not a chemist so my understanding, as presented here, is based on what sense I can make of a range of material, some of it quite technical.

In the section on “Garnet” in Geology.com, it is noted that Garnet is the name used for a large group of rock-forming minerals: These minerals share a common crystal structure and a generalized chemical composition of X3Y2(SiO4)3. In that composition, “X” can be Ca, Mg, Fe2+ or Mn2+, and “Y” can be Al, Fe3+, Mn3+, V3+ or Cr3+.

Click on the Table below to see how different types of garnets have different chemical compositions in which the X and Y position for chemical elements vary: 

The Note on this Table (above) points out that “the compositions listed…are for end members of several solid solution series”. In other words, there are gradations in the series of stones we call garnets and when we group them we are breaking up a continuum, creating “end members” at the start and end of each group. “Garnets are a related group of minerals whose chemical compositions can vary continuously from one to the other” (p. 160 in Busbey et al., 2013, “Rocks & Fossils“). There is actually a wide range of types of garnets that are grouped in various ways. Wikigempedia reports that the garnet family is divided into two sub-groups, Pyralspite which is Calcium-free garnet and Ugrandite which is Calcium-rich garnet. Almandine (iron-aluminium silicate), Pyrope (magnesium-aluminium silicate), and Spessartine (manganese-aluminium silicate) are the main members of Pyralspite sub-group, and Grossular (Calcium-aluminium silicate), Andradite (calcium-iron silicate) and Uvarovite (calcium-chromium silicate) are the members of Ugrandite sub-group.

The excellent article on Garnet in Wikigempedia presents a table which summarises the common properties of all garnets as well as the variations in chemical formulae for three types of garnets: 

We are now able to make a little more sense of the Wikipedia entry on hydrogrossular, mentioned in the previous Post, where it states:

Hydrogrossular is a calcium aluminium garnet series (formula: Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x, with hydroxide (OH) partially replacing silica (SiO4)). The endmembers of the hydrogarnet family (grossular, hibschite, and katoite) depend on the degree of substitution (x):
grossular: x = 0
hibschite: 0.2 < x < 1.5
katoite: 1.5 < x < 3.

The latter part of this statement is in effect saying that there are slightly different types of hydrogrossular caused by varying degrees of replacement of silica by hydroxide in the stone.  

The Geology.com article points out that garnets in general have a “vitreous [glassy] luster, a transparent-to-translucent diaphaneity [transparency], a brittle tenacity, and a lack of cleavage.” Furthermore, they can be found as individual crystals, stream-worn or beach-worn pebbles, granular aggregates, and/or massive occurrences (“massive” meaning lacking internal crystalline structure).

Wikipedia explains that hydrogrossular is “found in massive crystal habit, sometimes grown in with idocrase [another mineral]”. In terms of its transparency, hydrogrossular is “translucent to opaque”, and can be found in the colours of green to bluish green, pink, white, and gray. The cause of the green color is chromium, and possibly iron. Pink hydrogrossular is caused by the presence of manganese. Hydrogrossular may also have dark gray to black small inclusions.

Wikipedia mentions that hydrogrossular garnet has similarities to jade. This can perhaps be seen in the way in which it can be carved – see Russell Beck’s carvings in Te Ara The Encyclopedia of New Zealand.

I am unsure why hydrogrossular garnets are not clear translucent crystals like other garnets can be. I have not found any explanation for that. My suspicion is that it has to do with their water content, the “hydroxide” component. This might “cloud” the stones in their composition.

The next Post in this series, Why are Hydrogrossular Garnets found in Nelson and Orepuki?, will consider why hydrogrossular garnets can primarily be found in two main regions in New Zealand, the Nelson area and the south-west of the South Island, some hundreds of kilometres apart.

What are Hydrogrossular Garnets?

I first came across reference to hydrogrossular garnets when gathering information online about the stones that could be found on Gemstone Beach, Orepuki, on the south coast of New Zealand’s South Island. Some brief descriptions of Gemstone Beach include comments along the following lines:  “Semi-precious gems such as garnet, jasper, quartz and nephrite can often be found on the beach. A few hours beachcombing could easily yield gems such as hydrogrossular, jasper, fossil worm casts and the elusive sapphire” (quoted from information about the Riverton–Aparima South Coast Heritage Trail. See also Nature’s Edge: Tuatapere and the mindat.org entry on Gemstone Beach.) The source of this description could be a Heritage Trail sign that, to my knowledge, is no longer at Gemstone Beach (I don’t recall having seen it on any of my visits).

Gemstone Beach Heritage Trail
Source: https://talltales.me/2013/02/24/the-south-of-the-south/photo-2-01-13-10-30-21-am

The Encyclopedia of New Zealand mentions hydrogrossular garnets in the following terms:

Calcium-rich garnet is called grossular. A red form, found in South Westland, is known as hessonite. Another variety, containing some water, is called hydrogrossular and was first identified at the Roding River near Nelson. It is also found on the beach near Orepuki in Southland. Rounded lumps of pale green hydrogrossular take a good polish and have been used for jewellery.   Hydrogrossular pebbles, being heavy and exceptionally hard, were used by Southland Māori as hammer stones for the making of stone implements

In many ways, all this information raised more questions for me than it answered. What does a hydrogrossular garnet look like? Is it a valuable gemstone, like other garnets? Why is it a garnet? How often can these stones be found on Gemstone Beach?

For a while, I mistakenly referred to them as “hydroglossular” (“…gloss…” not “…gross…”), thinking that because they were likely to be shiny they would be glossy. On my first few trips to Gemstone Beach, I decided that there was a particular stone that was probably a “hydroglossular”, even thought it seemed quite dull. It was a grey stone that was kind of a dull quartz-like thing, looking like there was water within its fabric (the “hydro” part).

I collected some and tried polishing them but they were very unremarkable stones.

So what does “hydrogrossular” mean? Wikipedia gives an answer that refers to the physical-chemical make-up of the stone: 

Hydrogrossular is a calcium aluminium garnet series (formula: Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x, with hydroxide (OH) partially replacing silica (SiO4)). The endmembers of the hydrogarnet family (grossular, hibschite, and katoite) depend on the degree of substitution (x):
grossular: x = 0
hibschite: 0.2 < x < 1.5
katoite: 1.5 < x < 3.
Hydrogrossular is a garnet variety in which a Si4+ is missing from a tetrahedral site. Charge balance is maintained by bonding a H+ to each of the four oxygens surrounding the vacant site.

So the “hydro” refers to “hydroxide”. Consulting Wikipedia again, hydroxide consists of an oxygen and hydrogen atom held together by a covalent bond, and carries a negative electric charge. It is an important but usually minor constituent of water. (I will comment on other aspects of the above physical-chemical description in the next Post in this series.) 

If you look up “grossular” in Wikipedia, you discover that “the name grossular is derived from the botanical name for the gooseberry, grossularia, in reference to the green garnet of this composition that is found in Siberia”. 

It wasn’t until someone I met on Gemstone Beach about a year ago showed me some hydrogrossular stones he had just picked up, and actually gave me a couple, that I realised what they looked like and, just as importantly, what they felt like. They feel waxy, not the same kind of smoothness as a quartz stone, which is cool to the touch in contrast to the more “warm” feel of a hydrogrossular.

The Riverton Museum, “Te Hikoi”, has a small room which displays stones from the area, linked to an exercise of stone collecting set up for children on holiday. It includes a few hyrdrogrossular stones. With the permission of Museum staff, I took some photos of the display and of the drawers of rock samples in this room.

The Southland Museum in Invercargill, now closed due to problems with Earthquake strengthening, had a Minerals display which included a non-smoothed rock of hydrogrossular garnet. 

On page 34 of the excellent “A Photographic Guide to Rocks and Minerals of New Zealand” by Nick Mortimer, Hamish Campbell and Margaret Low (2011) is an entry on “Hydrogrossular”: 

Five key points made in this entry are:

1) Its chemical composition is hydrous calcium aluminium silicate.  

2) Hydrogrossular garnet hardly ever occurs as good crystals but rather as dense masses.

3) It can be found in the Nelson area as well as around Orepuki.

4) It is one of 13 minerals first described in New Zealand. 

5) It was first identified by Colin Hutton in 1943.

In the next Post in this series, Why are Hydrogrossular Stones Called Garnets?, I will look at the first two points. Later Posts include Why are Hydrogrossular Garnets found in Nelson and Orepuki? and What is Hydrogrossular’s Place Among the Thirteen Minerals First Described From New Zealand?  Also see Hydrogrossular Garnet on TumbleStoneTwo. Three significant later Posts on hydrogrossular garnets are February-March 2022 Fossicking Trip: Stone of the Day #15, Hydrogrossular Garnet from Gemstone Beach and February-March 2022 Fossicking Trip: Stone of the Day #19, Big Gemstone Beach Hydrogrossular Garnet and January 2022, Stone of the Day #20 – Brown Hydrogrossular Garnet from Gemstone Beach.  

Raining on the Rock

Uluru is probably the biggest “rock” in this part of the world, a gigantic sandstone boulder on the other side of the Tasman Sea, in the heart of the Australian Outback. It stands 350 metres high, with most of its bulk lying underground, and has a total circumference of nearly 10 kilometres. The remarkable feature of Uluru is its homogeneity and lack of jointing and parting at bedding surfaces. This means that scree slopes and soil have not developed there. These characteristics have led to its survival, while the surrounding rocks were eroded. I have always enjoyed John Williamson’s “Raining on the Rock”, even using it at times in my lectures. The first YouTube clip below is Williamson’s song, the second clip is drone footage of Uluru, and the third clip is Midnight Oil’s “Dead Heart”. Both pieces of music feature impressive guitar playing. Lyrics are at the end of this post. 

LYRICS

“Raining on the Rock”
by John Williamson

Pastel red to burgundy and spinifex to gold,
We’ve just come out of the Mulga where the plains forever roll.
And Albert Namatjira has painted all the scenes,
And a shower has changed the lustre of his land.

And it’s raining on the Rock,
In a beautiful country,
And I’m proud to travel this big land
Like an Aborigine.
And it’s raining on the Rock.
What an almighty sight to see!
And I’m wishing on a postcard that you were here with me.

Everlasting daisies and the beautiful desert rose –
Where does their beauty come from heaven knows.
I could ask the wedge-tail but he’s away too high,
I wonder if he understands it’s wonderful to fly.

And it’s raining on the Rock,
In a beautiful country,
And I’m proud to travel this big land
Like an Aborigine.
And it’s raining on the Rock.
What an almighty sight to see!
And I’m wishing on a postcard that you were here with me.

It cannot be described with a picture,
The mesmerising colours of the Olgas,
Or the grandeur of the Rock – 
Uluru has power!

And it’s raining on the Rock,
In a beautiful country,
And I’m proud to travel this big land
Like an Aborigine.
And it’s raining on the Rock.
What an almighty sight to see!
And I’m wishing on a postcard that you were here with me.

“The Dead Heart”
by Midnight Oil

We don’t serve your country,
Don’t serve your king,
Know your custom, don’t speak your tongue.
White man came took everyone.

We don’t serve your country,
Don’t serve your king.
White man listen to the songs we sing.
White man came took everything.

We carry in our hearts the true country
And that cannot be stolen.
We follow in the steps of our ancestry
And that cannot be broken.

We don’t serve your country,
Don’t serve your king,
Know your custom, don’t speak your tongue.
White man came took everyone.

We don’t need protection,
Don’t need your hand.
Keep your promise on where we stand.
We will listen, we’ll understand.

We carry in our hearts the true country
And that cannot be stolen.
We follow in the steps of our ancestry
And that cannot be broken…

Mining companies, Pastoral companies,
Uranium companies, Collected companies,
Got more right than people,
Got more say than people.

Forty thousand years can make a difference to the state of things.

The dead heart lives here.

A Batch of Polished Stones from Riverton’s Back Beach

These 78 stones were collected from the Back Beach in March 2019. They were initially tumbled in 320 grit as they were smooth beach pebbles. They were then tumbled in pre-polish and pro-polish tin oxide and burnished in borax. Altogether, these stones were processed  in a 4lb rubber barrel for four weeks. 

Each stone has its own interest and attraction. The following are some of the most intriguing (Note: Some of the close-ups have been manipulated a bit to explore the patterns and colours):

 

 

The Back Beach at Riverton faces Stewart Island, some 40 kilometres away across Foveaux Strait, a rough and often treacherous stretch of water. The powerful waves are ideal for smoothing stones as they are tossed back and forth and up and down the beach. 

Visiting the Beach at McCracken’s Rest near Orepuki

I spent a few days based in Riverton early in May, on a stone collection trip. Two of my aims were to spend more time on Gemstone Beach and to explore the beach further to the west, near a place called McCracken’s Rest. I took an extra suitcase down with me so that I could carry more stones home with me than I usually do on the plane. I ended up bringing back 26.5 kgs of carefully selected beach pebbles.

Day One at Riverton saw me drive out to McCracken’s Rest, 36 kilometres from Riverton. This is a roadside lay-by and viewpoint eight kilometres west of Orepuki and Gemstone Beach. 

On YouTube is this clip which gives a good sense of the roadside lay-by (although at 1:24 Stewart Island is misidentified – it is in fact well hidden in the mist – the piece of land referred to as Stewart Island is really the headland between Monkey Island and Cosy Nook, the headland just south of Orepuki – see the third last photo, bottom left, in the group below).  

The beach between Orepuki and McCracken’s lies below cliffs all the way along so access is very difficult. At the viewpoint at McCracken’s Rest, I hopped over the fence and carefully made my way down the steep slope to the beach below. 

The beach at McCracken’s Rest is similar to the beach further south-east, back towards Gemstone Bach and the Waimeamea Lagoon. There is a low bank of stones above the high tide mark, along with a wide scattering of drift wood. Closer to the waves, there are sandy patches and drifts of smaller stones.

I spent two and a half hours there – the day was largely fine and with little wind, which allowed the sandflies to be active. I slowly walked (and fossicked) just over a kilometre north-westwards to the start of the Te Waewae Lagoon (created by the Waiau River trying to find a path to the sea). The actual mouth of the Waiau River can vary in position along this gravel bar, depending on the countervailing forces of the river’s flow and the stones thrown up by the sea.

There seemed to be more slightly larger and less rounded stones here than at Gemstone Beach, and I did not see as many colourful ones. I also found no hydrogrossular garnets although there were fossil worm cast stones.

I collected quite a few stones on the beach but later discarded many of them after careful re-examination. This was partly because I found much better stones later at Gemstone Beach and on the Riverton beaches. I still ended up bringing home 2.3 kilograms of stones from the beach between McCracken’s Rest and Te Waewae Lagoon.

Before returning to Riverton, I drove up to Fishing Camp Road, about two and a half kilometres north-west of McCracken’s Rest, and drove along it to the shores of the Te Waewae Lagoon. This brought me to the landward side of the lagoon, near a handful of fisher huts and a boat ramp. The stones there were dirty and slimy and uninteresting – but one could gaze across the lagoon at the gravel bar separating the lagoon from the sea and see the kind of interesting ones to be found between there and Gemstone Beach.

Nine Milestones at Journey’s End

For a number of years before I retired from the University of Waikato, I assisted with the supervision of Gemma Piercy-Cameron’s PhD thesis. Gemma was finally successful in completing her grand project, Baristas: The Artisan Precariat, a few months ago. Currently, Gemma is a Lecturer in Sociology and Social Policy at the University of Waikato (see her Staff Profile). I presented her with nine milestones to mark her accomplishment.

The following letter accompanied Gemma’s milestones (photos added here):

Why Nine Stones?
Nine is seen to have philosophical significance, due to its unique numerical attributes. In the Hebrew tradition, for instance, Nine represents truth, since it reproduces itself when multiplied. Multiply any number by 9, then add the resulting digits and reduce them to a single digit, it always becomes a 9 again, e.g., 6 x 9 = 54, 5 + 4 = 9; 23 x 9 = 207, 2 + 0 + 7 = 9. Another attribute of Nine is that when added to any other number and then that number is reduced to a single digit, it always comes back to itself, as if nothing was added at all. For example, 5 + 9 = 14, 1 + 4 = 5; 7 + 9 = 16, 1 + 6 = 7. Nine is the Triple Triad, consisting of three times three, and so is seen as symbolic of completion, fulfillment, attainment, the beginning and the end, the ultimate whole number. Appropriate to recognise the completion of a PhD!

Stone #1 “Coffee”

Unknown type, collected at Riverton (Southland) July 2017, polishing completed September 2017. Polishing brought out the creamy swirl that reminded me so strongly of coffee and latte art that I knew it was destined for you.

 

Stone #2 “Positioned Sparkle”

Mica-rich pegmatite rock, collected at Joyce Bay (near Charleston, Buller District) March 2017, unpolished. Your thesis reflects who you are, and sparkles as it is turned to be viewed from different positions. Different things will be seen in it depending on who views it from which position.

 

Stone #3 “Effort”

Mudstone, collected at Riverton July 2017, polishing completed September 2017. This stone started millions of years ago as a number of sediment layers, being compressed by weight and heat. Your thesis consists of layers of effort and activity, building on each other, one layer being the foundation for the other. Over time, effort becomes more focused, refined, productive, until completion is reached.

003g
Henderson Bay, Riverton

 

Stone #4 “Complexity”

Jasper, with silica, collected at Riverton February 2018, polishing completed August 2018. Reality is complex and resists analysis. Analysis is hard labour.

 

Stone #5 “Depth”

Pale green Quartzite, collected at Orepuki (Southland), April 2016, polishing completed November 2017. Depth of understanding and insight is gained by multi-method qualitative research.

 

Stone #6 “Found Worthy”

Banded Agate, collected on Birdlings Flat (Canterbury) June 2016, polishing completed September 2016. Agate is formed from quartz crystals growing in layers so small they can barely be seen. The layers build up to fill cavities in sediments left by gas bubbles in volcanic rocks. This particular banded agate is very unusual (the only one of its kind I have found) – when held up to the light, it is apparent that the bands are not smooth but have intricate and delicate lace-like waves in them. This stone will have originated in the Alps, been washed down a Canterbury river, and swept along the coast to be deposited on Birdlings Flat which abuts Banks Peninsula. Your thesis has survived close examination in the light of others’ assessments, and has been found to be worthy of scholarly esteem.

 

Stone #7 “Patterns”

Unknown type (possibly a type of schist?), collected at Riverton February 2018, polishing completed August 2018. Research identifies patterns and layers and makes sense of them for others.

 

Stone #8 “It takes time to construct an interesting story”

Argillite metamorphic mudstone, with fossil worm casts, collected at Orepuki February 2018, polishing completed August 2018. This argillite started as mud under the sea 250-280 million years ago. The interesting linear features were left behind by ancient worms who had ingested lighter coloured mud. All pieces of scholarly writing, including your thesis, are like fossils of your thoughts at a particular period of time, persisting in existence even as you go on to other thoughts and activities.

 

Stone #9 “Well Travelled and Wide Ranging”

Quartzite, stained with iron, collected at Budleigh Salterton (Devon, England) May 2018, polishing completed August 2018. These Devon stones are identical to rocks found in Brittany in France. Some 200-250 million years ago, Brittany was mountainous and rivers drained from it northwards across the Triassic desert, across what was to become the English Channel. The quartzite rocks were tumbled into pebbles and eventually deposited as pebble beds outcropping on cliffs at the beach of Budleigh Salterton village. Good PhD research takes time, has gone places, and has a broad base of experience and reflective thought.

Some Recently Polished Stones from Riverton

001
Just out of a 3lb borax burnishing tumble, 43 newly-polished stones from a Riverton beach.

I collected these stones at a beach I call the “Beach Past the Back Beach” at Howells Point, Riverton, in March 2019. When you reach the end of the road at Howells Point, there is a track up the sand dunes. Down the other side is this beach, which stretches for maybe 900 metres further westwards. Many of these stones were found at the far eastern corner, the area circled in this photo:

000a
Riverton’s “Back Beach” is the stretch along the last part of the road that winds along the coast. If you walk over the dunes from there, you come to the “Beach Past the Back Beach”.

These are not particularly spectacular stones, though some are really interesting. Not all have polished perfectly, some have scratches and holes in them, but I polished them because of their intriguing colours and patterns.

Photos of a selection of these newly-polished stones: